Can Bitcoin be the US's remedy to a $38 trillion debt crisis?
The United States currently faces a staggering national debt of around $38 trillion, surpassing its GDP by almost a third. With such fiscal pressures mounting, some proponents of Bitcoin suggest it could offer a radical solution—acting not just as a hedge, but as a reserve asset capable of offsetting sovereign liabilities. But the numbers tell a different story. To match the total debt using Bitcoin’s approximate 19.93 million coins, each would need to reach nearly $1.9 million in value. And since the U.S. government only holds about 326,373 BTC (~1.6% of total supply), that figure would soar to about $116 million per coin to even nominally cover the debt. Even this overlooks practical issues: limited liquidity, locked or lost coins, and the sheer scale of issuance needed. In short, while Bitcoin underlines key concerns about fiat money and endless credit expansion, it remains highly impractical as a debt-clearing tool for America’s budget woes.
The Key points
- U.S. national debt has climbed beyond $38 trillion, growing at one of the fastest rates in modern times.
- Some policymakers and crypto advocates argue Bitcoin’s fixed supply offers an anti-inflation, reserve-asset role.
- A simple calculation dividing $38 trillion by ~19.93 million BTC yields nearly $1.9 million per coin.
- The U.S. government holds only ~326,373 BTC (≈1.6% of total supply), pushing required coin-price dramatically higher.
- At that holding level, each Bitcoin would need to reach about $116 million to cover the debt.
- The theoretical market cap this implies — more than $230 trillion — exceeds twice the world’s annual GDP.
- A large fraction of Bitcoin is illiquid: lost keys, long-term wallets, or unmovable reserves make real conversion impossible.
- Liquidity in Bitcoin markets (tens of billions per day) is infinitesimal compared to multi-trillion dollar bond or FX markets.
- The exercise underscores a structural flaw in fiat credit-driven fiscal systems: liabilities can grow faster than credible collateral.
- Ultimately, while Bitcoin may serve as a macro hedge or diversification tool, it cannot realistically substitute for policy reforms, tax discipline or controlled deficit spending
Disclaimer: This preview includes title, image, and description automatically sourced from the original website (cryptoslate.com) using publicly available metadata / OG tags. All rights, including copyright and content ownership, remain with the original publisher. If you are the content owner and wish to request removal, please contact us from your official email to no_reply@newspaperhunt.com.
